Organizational Behavior Case Study Using

Abstract We chose to number at a military type that was exposed by the media last year in which Brigadier commonplace (BG) James BG Botchie of the United States childs play ram down was accused of stand that was unbecoming of an officer. By examining the roots of simple constitutional theory as well as the systems theory approach to instruction, we will be able to see what aspects and principles should be wear out utilized and enforced in order to prevent such incidences from reoccurring. ? Organizational Behavior Case workplace UsingClassical Organization supposition and Systems Theory In order to see where Brigadier General James Botchies management went wrong, we will use the classical organization theory and systems theory to evaluate his action and decisions. To reserve support to our conclusion, Tommy will sh atomic number 18 a personal encounter he had with BG Botchie. Quotes from various texts will a ilk offer support to our position that BG Botchies approach to management was non simply ineffective, but withal inappropriate for an officer in the United States commit Force.Classical Organization Theory While whatsoever aspects of classical organizational theory can be considered out of date, it has been constantly progressing over the past century to cleanse suit current workplace environments. From Taylors scientific management theory to Webers bureaucratic theory exclusively the charge to Mooney and Reileys administrative theory, classical organizational theory has develop some of the most fundamental principles to help better manage people in the workplace.In order to effectively insure how classical organization theory could help a situation, such as the one regarding Brigadier General James Botchie as reported by the Air Force Times, one must first look at the basic principles behind the theory. One of the four central points in Frederick Taylors scientific management theory is to, closely supervise workers, and use reward a nd punishment as motivators (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009). In BG Botchies situation, he provided little to no supervision to his subordinates and was described as hands-off, uninformed and at times uncaring (Fontaine 2). This escape of upervision caused the military equal opportunity office (MEO) to be an unorganized and nonproductive environment that allowed discrimination and determent to go undisciplined and undocumented in many cases. A nonher Taylorism stated that the task of management is cookery and controller (Walonick, 1993). From what the Air Force Times showed, BG Botchie did not follow either of these guidelines. Military organizations require all parties to abide by strict scratchs of conduct in order to function as a well-oiled machine. BG Botchies actions not only reflect poorly on his work ethics, but similarly his moral ethics.He did not act as is judge of a United States serviceman Personnel are expected to conduct themselves in accordance with the highest stan dards of personal and professional integrity and ethics. At a minimum, all personnel shall abide by with directives issued by the Secretary of Defense regarding the Standards of Conduct and Government Ethics. (Dalton, 1997). Much like the rank levels involved in military organizations, Max Webers bureaucratic theory emphasized the need for a vertical structure of power (Walonick, 1993).In order to continue maintaining control among soldiers or workers alike, there is a need for definite rules and a clear line of authority and control (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009). BG Botchie allowed this line to become blurred when he developed friendships with his subordinates. Not only did this lead to unprofessional conduct in the form of creating an inner boys only bivouac that harassed female coworkers, it also raised an ethical dilemma in that BG Botchie engaged in communication channel deals with subordinates and possibly used government resources to further his profits (Fontaine 4).There i s a reason for positions of authority and that is to maintain control and productivity in the office. BG Botchie instead used his authority to foster sexual harassment and gender discrimination, do unprofessional relationships and misappropriate government resources for his own benefit (Fontaine 1). Mooney and Reillys administrative theory proved to be the most rigid out of the classical organization theories. This theory put the emphasis on establishing a universal set of management principles that could be applied to all organizations (Walonick, 1993).It is now realized that this is not realizable with the fast paced changing of times however, this method could be used to help remedy the inconsistencies that occurred in BG Botchies wing. For example, if there was a uniform set of rules and procedures set in place and enforced regularly, people like BG Botchie would not have a chance to abuse their power. Throughout examining the classical organizational approach to resoluteness Brigadier General James Botchies erroneous behaviors, the key solution is enforcement of hierarchy.None of this would have occurred if BG Botchies superiors had salaried closer attention to his actions. While people in positions of authority should not have to instill tending in order to get results, they should be treated with the respect they deserve. That respect facilitates efficiency and respect for partner coworkers as well. By maintaining the proper order of ranks, work is accomplished as a result of a sense of pride in work and duty to ones job. In addition to an subjoin in productivity, the level of discrimination and harassment would decline for fear of punishment.When the rules are enforced and there are positive and negative repercussions for behaviors, people are more inclined to follow the regulations set forth. Simply put, to void negative situations, such as BG Botchies, enforce the rules and regulations that are set forth. Systems Approach This situation could have also benefited from the systems approach to the Ohio Air National Guard Organization. The United States Air Force maintains a strict code of conduct as an entire organization and also employs separate, more detailed rules and regulations for those enlisted and those who are officers.The enlisted ranks are seen as the workers or followers to the officer ranks. The officer ranks are seen as the leaders of the organization and they are expected to set the tones for how those that follow them are to conduct themselves. Rules are established to help keep the distinction amongst the appointed leaders and those who are the followers and to prevent any bias from effecting promotions or allowing preferential preaching from the leaders of the organization. Brigadier General James Botchie was fortunate to experience both the leader and follower sides of the Air Force.BG Botchie started out in the enlisted ranks before he was com banged to the officer ranks. I had the opportunity to wor k for BG Botchie later the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Centers in 2001. He was the flight commander and highest be officer for the mission. As a unit, the 121st Air Refueling Wing (ARW) was assigned to support Operation permanent Freedom at the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey. My job as an enlisted worker was for various electronic functions of our airplane.My ultimate goal was to make sure that the pilots could complete their mission, which required all of the aircraft to be operational. We accomplished this mission and pleased BG Botchie. He attempted to reward us (the enlisted workers) with alcoholic beverages in an enlisted only establishment. I enumerate you this story to give yet an some other example of the rules being established and BG Botchie acting as though he was above them and as if there would be no ramifications for breaking them. Systems theory can be described as having all components of an organization interrelated.By changing one variable, many othe rs may also be effected (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009). Modern day management has to understand that the decisions imposed on one part of an organization can have a great impact on other members of the organization, even if they are not directly related to the initial decision. BG Botchies decisions were not thoroughly thought out and he did not consider the impact that they would have across the organization. The decisions he made for his immediate group not only affected the morale, behavior, and work ethics, but it also reached throughout the entire Air National Guard.The 121st ARW is always partnered with other units from all across the United States. This behavior is observed by others who may have had a opposite managerial style and expectation. This is also evident in the following quotes The organizational systems theory also infuses a culture that is transformed to a learning environment. A creative learning environment will also help the organization and its members realize t hat the small decisions made today may affect a ball-shaped impact tomorrow (Smith & Taylor, 2000). The Central premise behind holding a vision is that somehow I can shape my futurity, systems thinking helps us see how our own actions have shaped our current reality, thereby giving us confidence that we can create a different reality in the future (Smith & Taylor, 2000). BG Botchie did not infuse the culture with the set of values and morals that the USAF instilled in his appointment as commanding general. If Brigadier General James Botchie analyzed his decisions using the systems approach for his managerial and decision establish processes, his career may have had a different outcome.Conclusion In conclusion, it is generally in everyones best interest to abide by the rules and regulations of an organization since they are set forth as a way to maintain order and protection for the employees. The classical organization theory and systems theory have clear manage principles that help to build a strong organization, when the policies are followed correctly. Having employees that respect the hierarchy of the organization is also internal to a successful workplace.Brigadier General James Botchie did not follow these guidelines and it hail him the respect of his peers and nearly cost him his job.? Bibliography Dalton, J. H. (1997). General Regulations Administration of Discipline. U. S. Navy Regulations, 1990 Interim Change, 101-102. Fontaine, S. (2012, May 23). Report Details 1-stars Inappropriate Conduct. Retrieved from Air Force Time Mobile http//www. airforcetimes. com/mobile/index. php? storyUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww. airforcetimes. com%2Fnews%2F2011%2F04%2Fair-force-ig-details-conduct-BG Botchie-041811w%2F Kinicki, A. & Kreitner, R. (2009). Organizational Dynamics and Human Behavior. The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. Smith, K. D. , & Taylor, W. G. (2000). The learning organisation ideal in Civil Service organisations deriving a measure. The Learning Organizatio n, 194-205. University, C. M. (2008). In Administration, Globalization and Multiculturalism (pp. 25, 30, 79, 360). McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. Walonick, D. S. (1993). Organizational Theory and Behavior. Retrieved from http//statpac. org/walonick/organizational-theory. htm